RANTS

Contributors

  • Orwell, George
  • Gare, Arran E.
  • Postman, Neil
  • Wachowski, Larry and Andy
  • Nancy Cartwright

  • George Orwell, 1984 (1948)

    On Historical Truth
    The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own  consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed - if all records told the same tale - then the lie passed into history and became truth. "Who controls the past," ran the Party slogan, "controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own  memory. "Reality control", they called it: in Newspeak, "doublethink". TOP
    Arran E.Gare, Postmodernism and The Environmental Crisis (1995)
    On the Current State of Universities

    ... universities are being fundamentally transformed. Thoroughly corrupted by the "publish or perish" syndrome and by the pressure to lower standards to accomodate the higher proportion of young people going on to higher education, they are being reduced to extensions of high schools and technical colleges, valued by governments only insofar as they provide people with vocational training or produce technological knowledge, and by students only to increase their earning power. Arts and science faculties have lost status within universities - with good reason. For the most part, undergraduate courses in arts faculties are being reduced to a form of entertainment and courses taught in the science faculties have been regeared to produce technicians. Within the arts faculties, careerists have excluded or marginalized people driven by a quest for understanding; while as Paul Feyerabend noted of the science faculties: "Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood of inane papers that now constitutes scientific progress in many areas." (p.25) TOP

    On Postmodernism and Economics

    Despite the incredulity towards all grand narratives, the grand narrative of economic progress as defined by economists has retained its dominating influence as a guide for political action by default. (p.25) TOP

    On Academics and Intellectuals

    Few academics today are intellectuals. (p.26) TOP

    On Advertising and Reality

    Advertisements have colonized social life to define reality and its significance, while at the same time reality has been depreciated and reduced to the status of a social product. The world of advertisements has become more real than the world of everyday life, and people in everyday life must strive to imitate the world created by advertisements to be acknowledged as significant, to be taken as a meaningful part of reality. (p.28) TOP

    Neil Postman, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (1993)
    On the Subversion of Language

    … radical technologies create new definitions of old terms, and .. this process takes place without our being fully conscious of it. Thus, it is insidious and dangerous, quite different from the process whereby new technologies introduce new terms to the language. (p.8) TOP

    … technology imperiously comandeers our most important terminology. It redefines "freedom", "truth", "intelligence", "fact", "wisdom", "memory", "history" - all the words we live by. And it does not pause to tell us. And we do not pause to ask. (pp.8-9) TOP

    On Consumerism

    In a technocracy - that is, a society only loosely controlled by social custom and religious tradition and driven by the impulse to invent - an "unseen hand" will eliminate the incompetent and reward those who produce cheaply and well the goods that people want. (p.41) TOP

    It also came to believed that the engine of technological progress worked most efficiently when people are conceived of not as children of God or even as citizens but as consumers - that is to say, as markets. (p.42) TOP

    On the Meaning of Technopoly

    Technopoly .. is totalitarian technocracy. (p.48) TOP

    Abetted by a form of education that in itself has been emptied of any coherent world-view, Technopoly deprives us of the social, political, historical, metaphysical, logical, or spiritual bases for knowing what is beyond belief. (p.58) TOP

    The relationship between information and the mechanisms for its control is fairly simple to describe. Technology increases the available supply of information. As the supply is increased, control mechanisms are strained. Additional control mechanisms are needed to cope with new information. When additional control mechanisms are themselves technical, they in turn further increase the supply of information. When the supply of information is no longer controllable, a general breakdown in psychic tranquility and social purpose occurs. Without defenses, people have no way of finding meaning in their experiences, lose their capacity to remember, and have difficulty imagining reasonable futures.

    One way of defining Technopoly, then, is to say it is what happens to society when the defenses against information glut have broken down. (p.72) TOP

    On Technological Determinism

    … technology creates its own imperatives and, at the same time, creates a wide-ranging social system to reinforce its imperatives. (p.105) TOP

    In a growing Technopoly, there is no time or inclination to speak of technological debits. (p.106) TOP

    On Technocratic Statisticians

    Lacking a lucid set of ethics and having rejected tradition, Technopoly searches for a source of authority and finds it in the idea of statistical objectivity. (p.132) TOP

    We must keep in mind the story of the statistician who drowned while trying to wade across a river with an average depth of four feet. That is to say, in a culture that reveres statistics, we can never be sure what sort of nonsense will lodge in people's heads. (p.132) TOP

    On Power

    The question with language, as with any other technique or machine, is and always has been, Who is to be the master ? Will we control it, or will it control us ? The argument, in short, is not with technique. The argument is with the triumph of technique, with techniques that become sanctified and rule out the possibility of other ones. (p.142) TOP

    The Technopoly story is without a moral centre. It puts in its place efficiency, interest, and economic advance. It promises heaven on earth through the conveniences of technological progress. It casts aside all traditional narratives and symbols that suggest stability and orderliness, and tells us, instead, of a life of skills, technical expertise, and the ecstasy of consumption. Its purpose is to produce functionaries for an ongoing Technopoly. (p.179) TOP

     Larry and Andy Wachowski, The Matrix (1999)
    The Matrix is everywhere, it's all around us, here even in this room. You can see it out your window, or on your television. You feel it when you go to work, or go to church or pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. TOP
     
     Nancy Cartwright, "Why Physics ?" In The Large, the Small and the Human Mind (1997)
    On Scientific Pluralism

    To say the laws of physics are true ceteris paribus is not to deny that they are true. They are just not enitirely sovereign. It is not realism about physics that is at stake under pluralism, but rather imperialism. (p.167) TOP